Saturday, February 11, 2012

Income an Educational Determinant?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/education/education-gap-grows-between-rich-and-poor-studies-show.html

Sabrina Tavernise tackles the issue of income inequality and how it greatly affects educational success. America has improved from its racial divisions in education, only to now face the the growing educational gap between the rich and poor. This problem has been aggravated by our recession, however, the issue really stems from the extra resources and time that money can buy a household. Rich parents' extra investment in their children –such as tutoring– can't be matched by cash-strapped families (especially single-parent ones), thus creating a domino effect that can influence dropping out of college.

This columnist admits the complexity of our educational problem. It can not simply be solved with a single reform movement or even a thriving economy. Possibly, tax rates following the Warren Buffet rule can help equalize funding. Yet, it is an extremely daunting task because America's capitalist society will always produce rich and poor, so trying to combat that would be near impossible.

Monday, January 30, 2012

Obama's Call for Educational Reform

http://www.annarbor.com/news/opinion/president-obama-has-it-right-america-needs-education/

In this opinion piece, Melanie Maxwell focuses on Obama's recent goals in education during his State of the Union address. He aspires to reduce college tuition and to raise the legal high school dropout age. College debts are daunting for students, either putting them in severe financial situations or discouraging them from even going to college. The current drop out age similarly reflects on America's "stupidity" that allows for a 16 year old to prematurely dictate his career (or lack of it). With these questions in mind, Obama suggested an incentive programs for colleges that would only give them federal funds if their tuition rates are "responsible." He also wants to raise the drop out rate to 18 or until graduation.

While educational reforms scare some Americans of the economic crises it can place on our already struggling economy, investing in our future can also be the solution to a stronger, smarter, America.

Friday, January 20, 2012

EDUCATION: Finland and the U.S.

http://news.stanford.edu/news/2012/january/finnish-schools-reform-012012.html

Stephen Tung writes about the idealized Finnish school system that is so culturally different from
America's. For one, Finland is ranked approximately 20 levels higher than America in math, science, and reading out of 65 countries tested. Their system obviously works, due to its different emphasis on education than in America. Funding is not dependent on merit (like in America), but rather, it's based on the number of students. Standardized tests are not used, and teaching jobs hold a heavier weight there. They are considered to be at the same level, if not higher, as that of doctors, lawyers, etc. While adopting a foreign system blindly is not wise, it still raises questions as to how America should operate to reflect more successful countries: whether we should emulate a rigid educational structure like that of Southeast Asia, or use Finland's more liberal method.

Saturday, January 7, 2012

Kristof Synthesis

This columnist has a strong affinity to write about humanitarian issues, particularly in third world countries. A lot of his articles also focus on government issues, such as corruption.
The 4 articles I read by Kristof all suggest his passion for honestly trying to improve the world. It's obvious he cares about these issues because he travels internationally and tries to call attention to various injustices (even being arrested on some occasions). Kristof probably accepts a realistic view of society; that a lot of it is suffering and nowhere near as progressive as fortunate places like America. However, there is also an element of hopefulness in his writings because he actively tries to counteract this injustice by appealing to readers to donate money or attend charity events.
Even though Kristof chooses to write about depressing and cynical aspects of the international society, he is urging for change and presses Americans to do something about it.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Repressing Democracy, With American Arms

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/18/opinion/sunday/kristof-repressing-democracy-with-american-arms.html?_r=1

Kristof focuses on the proposed $53 million arms sale with Bahrain that Obama must decide whether to approve. He concedes the fact that Bahrain does serve as a useful buffer state between Iran and America, and U.S. naval bases are stationed in Bahrain. Kristof then raises doubts whether America should support the Kingdom of Bahrain since it supports "systematic, violent oppression." By providing arms to tyranny, America is ruining its own reputation to uphold democracy. Kristof enforces this opinion by writing about two victims of the Bahrain regime which emphasize the Bahrain government's evils.

Sunday, December 11, 2011

"Congo Elections"

http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/notes-from-a-young-american-in-congo-the-election/#more-10301

In the Congo, presidential elections are radically different than ones in America because choosing a president is much more complex. Congolese people must consider the possibilities of war and violence when choosing their president since they have a history of crises. Other factors also affect the election process, such as tribal biases, ballot corruption, and lack of media attention. Congolese voters are generally impoverished and illiterate, so important political issues either don't reach them, or have no effect on them. With all these problems, hope for a fair and prospering Congo is slim.

Saturday, December 10, 2011

"Bombing Continues in Sudan"

http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/11/17/bombing-continues-in-sudan-creating-a-crisis/#more-10223

Kristof calls attention to the crisis in Sudan that terrorizes Sudanese civilians. After the end of a 22-year war, Sudanese people are exiling from the Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile regions. However, the Sudanese government is preventing any humanitarian aid from reaching these people in an effort to not widely publicize this event. Along with random airstrikes, the government is leaving refugees devoid of bare necessities. Kristof calls for immediate assistance and awareness of this conflict.

He is obviously against this situation and tries to remedy it by calling for action. By explicitly stating his opinion that the "United Nations must prevent this crisis from getting any worse...to avert a long-term humanitarian crisis," Kristof portrays to his audience a sense of urgency and forcefulness. His most effective means of communicating to his audiences is the personal aspect of his piece, more so than his other columns. Early on, Kristof emotionally informs the reader that he "witnessed the misery and suffering" of Sudan. He further personalizes his message by describing the physical contact he had with these refugees, particularly during bombing raids, and ends his piece with sympathetic stories and statistics.